Chemistry Talk
Chemistry Talk
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

A chemical engineering question for space colonization

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Chemistry Talk Forum Index -> Chemistry Talk
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Logan Kearsley
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 1:40 am    Post subject: A chemical engineering question for space colonization Reply with quote

Say you're floating in the atmosphere of Venus, and you want to
manufacture more lifting gas for your balloon. You've got a mixture of
mostly CO2 with a little bit of nitrogen to start with (just regular
Venusian atmosphere).
What's the simplest way to produce pure nitrogen (for lifting gas) and
pure carbon monoxide (for additional lifting gas and fuel), plus waste
oxygen?

-l.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Logan Kearsley
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 2:51 am    Post subject: Re: A chemical engineering question for space colonization Reply with quote

On Jun 27, 9:10 pm, Mark Thorson <nos...@sonic.net> wrote:
Quote:
Logan Kearsley wrote:

Say you're floating in the atmosphere of Venus, and you want to
manufacture more lifting gas for your balloon. You've got a mixture of
mostly CO2 with a little bit of nitrogen to start with (just regular
Venusian atmosphere).
What's the simplest way to produce pure nitrogen (for lifting gas) and
pure carbon monoxide (for additional lifting gas and fuel), plus waste
oxygen?

Isn't the Venusian atmosphere full of water vapor?
That would be a better lifting gas than either
of your favorite gases.

Trace amounts of H2SO4 (enough to make the clouds), practically no
water. You could make water from H2SO4, but the vapor pressure isn't
high enough to use on its own without additional heating, and I still
want CO to use as fuel.

-l.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Linlin Yan
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 3:08 am    Post subject: Re: A chemical engineering question for space colonization Reply with quote

On Jun 28, 9:40 am, Logan Kearsley <chronosur...@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
Say you're floating in the atmosphere of Venus, and you want to
manufacture more lifting gas for your balloon. You've got a mixture of
mostly CO2 with a little bit of nitrogen to start with (just regular
Venusian atmosphere).
What's the simplest way to produce pure nitrogen (for lifting gas) and
pure carbon monoxide (for additional lifting gas and fuel), plus waste
oxygen?

-l.

I guess that heating may be another way.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Mark Thorson
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 7:10 am    Post subject: Re: A chemical engineering question for space colonization Reply with quote

Logan Kearsley wrote:
Quote:

Say you're floating in the atmosphere of Venus, and you want to
manufacture more lifting gas for your balloon. You've got a mixture of
mostly CO2 with a little bit of nitrogen to start with (just regular
Venusian atmosphere).
What's the simplest way to produce pure nitrogen (for lifting gas) and
pure carbon monoxide (for additional lifting gas and fuel), plus waste
oxygen?

Isn't the Venusian atmosphere full of water vapor?
That would be a better lifting gas than either
of your favorite gases.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


trigonometry1972@gmail.co
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Jul 05, 2008 8:21 am    Post subject: Re: A chemical engineering question for space colonization Reply with quote

On Jun 27, 6:40 pm, Logan Kearsley <chronosur...@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
Say you're floating in the atmosphere of Venus, and you want to
manufacture more lifting gas for your balloon. You've got a mixture of
mostly CO2 with a little bit of nitrogen to start with (just regular
Venusian atmosphere).
What's the simplest way to produce pure nitrogen (for lifting gas) and
pure carbon monoxide (for additional lifting gas and fuel), plus waste
oxygen?

-l.

I'll suggest this idea is missing to point to an extent in that
at least the first batch of lifting gas will need to drop in from
orbit with the vehicle. And then the H2SO4 may degrade the
balloon before it would need a refill. It is not like one would setup
human residence in such a hostile gravity well with
such a savage environment down below.

The other issue that comes to mind is the nature of temperature
regimen
in the planets atmosphere. It would be nice even for a probe
to remain int a moderate temperature attitude to reduce engineering
challenges.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Guest






PostPosted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 4:45 am    Post subject: Re: A chemical engineering question for space colonization Reply with quote

On Jun 27, 6:40 pm, Logan Kearsley <chronosur...@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
Say you're floating in the atmosphere of Venus, and you want to
manufacture more lifting gas for your balloon. You've got a mixture of
mostly CO2 with a little bit of nitrogen to start with (just regular
Venusian atmosphere).
What's the simplest way to produce pure nitrogen (for lifting gas) and
pure carbon monoxide (for additional lifting gas and fuel), plus waste
oxygen?

-l.


wild guess... membrane separation possibly followed by electrolysis of
CO2 (in molten carbonate)

Michael
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Logan Kearsley
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 5:48 am    Post subject: Re: A chemical engineering question for space colonization Reply with quote

On Jul 5, 4:21 am, "trigonometry1...@gmail.com |"
<trigonometry1...@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Jun 27, 6:40 pm, Logan Kearsley <chronosur...@gmail.com> wrote:

Say you're floating in the atmosphere of Venus, and you want to
manufacture more lifting gas for your balloon. You've got a mixture of
mostly CO2 with a little bit of nitrogen to start with (just regular
Venusian atmosphere).
What's the simplest way to produce pure nitrogen (for lifting gas) and
pure carbon monoxide (for additional lifting gas and fuel), plus waste
oxygen?

-l.

I'll suggest this idea is missing to point to an extent in that
at least the first batch of lifting gas will need to drop in from
orbit with the vehicle. And then the H2SO4 may degrade the

Where the initial lifting gas comes from doesn't matter, and acid-
resistant materials are available for the balloons.

Quote:
balloon before it would need a refill. It is not like one would setup
human residence in such a hostile gravity well with
such a savage environment down below.

Human habitation isn't under consideration. Note, I said the oxygen
was waste. I only care about lifting gas and fuel.

Quote:
The other issue that comes to mind is the nature of temperature
regimen
in the planets atmosphere. It would be nice even for a probe
to remain int a moderate temperature attitude to reduce engineering
challenges.

There's a region of nearly-Earthlike temperature & pressure about
around about 60 kilometers altitude.

-l.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Logan Kearsley
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 5:50 am    Post subject: Re: A chemical engineering question for space colonization Reply with quote

On Jul 6, 12:45 am, mrdarr...@gmail.com wrote:
Quote:
On Jun 27, 6:40 pm, Logan Kearsley <chronosur...@gmail.com> wrote:

Say you're floating in the atmosphere of Venus, and you want to
manufacture more lifting gas for your balloon. You've got a mixture of
mostly CO2 with a little bit of nitrogen to start with (just regular
Venusian atmosphere).
What's the simplest way to produce pure nitrogen (for lifting gas) and
pure carbon monoxide (for additional lifting gas and fuel), plus waste
oxygen?

-l.

wild guess... membrane separation possibly followed by electrolysis of
CO2 (in molten carbonate)

The best solution I've come up with so far is to use pressure-swing
adsorption for the gas separation & zirconium electrolysis to crack
CO2 into CO and O2. Zirconium electrolysis looks pretty much ideal,
but PSA involves several moving parts (valves) with limited expected
lifespan. Something that can work in steady-state with fewer or no
moving parts would be preferred. Are there suitable membranes that
would pass either N2 or CO2, but not both?

-l.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Chemistry Talk Forum Index -> Chemistry Talk All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Australian Debt Consolidation Experts
medical insurance
Wedding Invitation
Escort, massaggiatrici e accompagnatrici a Modena, Bologna, Parma, Brescia, Vicenza ...
UK Telephone Sex
Photoshop
life insurance quotes
Make Your Own Website
Cheap phone calls to Canada
Cleaning Service
Mold
UK Swingers Genuine Contacts Site
Sex Links
printer cartridges
Wines
Vacuum Cleaner Bags


Board Security

75 Attacks blocked

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group